• Home
  • Support the Recall!
    • Recall Main Page
    • Form SEL 350 Petition
    • The Cost of Personal Bias
    • Election Denied
    • Council Vacancies Delay
    • SCM Election Req. Letter
    • Council Winfrey Statement
    • Interim Admin Resigns
  • NEW City Budget Concerns
    • SCM's City Budget Report
    • False Savings Claims
    • Missing Fund Balances
  • Transparency Problems
    • Intro to Financial Issues
    • SC Audits
    • Failure to Reconcile
    • Budgets from Thin Air
    • PERS and IRS Problems
    • Surplus Funds
    • LGIP Fund and Transfers
    • Admin Parrys Claims
    • Sting With Fees
    • A Hidden $1.6M Windfall
    • Budget Obfuscation - FY26
    • FY2021 Audit Documents
    • FY2023 Audit Documents
    • FY2022 Audit Documents
  • Main Menu
    • Who We Are
    • SCM Platform and Concerns
    • A Vision to Move Forward
    • Responding to Council
    • Financial Transparency
    • Meet Our Members
  • Water
  • SCM Council Responses
    • Index to SCM Statements
    • SCM Official Stmt 3-19-26
    • SCM Official Stmt 3-5-26
    • Caught on Open Mic
    • SCM Richardson Response
    • SCM Nuckles Response
    • SCM Private Mtg Response
    • 3-19-2026_Redacted Letter
    • 3-19-26_Internal_Controls
  • More
    • Home
    • Support the Recall!
      • Recall Main Page
      • Form SEL 350 Petition
      • The Cost of Personal Bias
      • Election Denied
      • Council Vacancies Delay
      • SCM Election Req. Letter
      • Council Winfrey Statement
      • Interim Admin Resigns
    • NEW City Budget Concerns
      • SCM's City Budget Report
      • False Savings Claims
      • Missing Fund Balances
    • Transparency Problems
      • Intro to Financial Issues
      • SC Audits
      • Failure to Reconcile
      • Budgets from Thin Air
      • PERS and IRS Problems
      • Surplus Funds
      • LGIP Fund and Transfers
      • Admin Parrys Claims
      • Sting With Fees
      • A Hidden $1.6M Windfall
      • Budget Obfuscation - FY26
      • FY2021 Audit Documents
      • FY2023 Audit Documents
      • FY2022 Audit Documents
    • Main Menu
      • Who We Are
      • SCM Platform and Concerns
      • A Vision to Move Forward
      • Responding to Council
      • Financial Transparency
      • Meet Our Members
    • Water
    • SCM Council Responses
      • Index to SCM Statements
      • SCM Official Stmt 3-19-26
      • SCM Official Stmt 3-5-26
      • Caught on Open Mic
      • SCM Richardson Response
      • SCM Nuckles Response
      • SCM Private Mtg Response
      • 3-19-2026_Redacted Letter
      • 3-19-26_Internal_Controls
  • Home
  • Support the Recall!
    • Recall Main Page
    • Form SEL 350 Petition
    • The Cost of Personal Bias
    • Election Denied
    • Council Vacancies Delay
    • SCM Election Req. Letter
    • Council Winfrey Statement
    • Interim Admin Resigns
  • NEW City Budget Concerns
    • SCM's City Budget Report
    • False Savings Claims
    • Missing Fund Balances
  • Transparency Problems
    • Intro to Financial Issues
    • SC Audits
    • Failure to Reconcile
    • Budgets from Thin Air
    • PERS and IRS Problems
    • Surplus Funds
    • LGIP Fund and Transfers
    • Admin Parrys Claims
    • Sting With Fees
    • A Hidden $1.6M Windfall
    • Budget Obfuscation - FY26
    • FY2021 Audit Documents
    • FY2023 Audit Documents
    • FY2022 Audit Documents
  • Main Menu
    • Who We Are
    • SCM Platform and Concerns
    • A Vision to Move Forward
    • Responding to Council
    • Financial Transparency
    • Meet Our Members
  • Water
  • SCM Council Responses
    • Index to SCM Statements
    • SCM Official Stmt 3-19-26
    • SCM Official Stmt 3-5-26
    • Caught on Open Mic
    • SCM Richardson Response
    • SCM Nuckles Response
    • SCM Private Mtg Response
    • 3-19-2026_Redacted Letter
    • 3-19-26_Internal_Controls

Financial Transparency vs. the "Low Information Status Quo"

In this section, we discuss Shady Cove's years of delayed and disclaimed Audits.  We think it's important for the public to understand the situation, so that they have context to evaluate our Council's actions over the past several years.  Scroll down the page to see a summary of the significant issues found during the

Overview of Delayed Audits

What does it Mean When an Audit is Considered "Disclaimed"?

What does it Mean When an Audit is Considered "Disclaimed"?

Under normal circumstances, Shady Cove's Municipal Audits should be completed within six months of the end of the Fiscal Year.   Audits and Audit Action Plans are required to be filed with the Oregon Secretary of State's Audit Division.  


  • Fiscal Year 2021  (July 1, 2020 thru June 30th 2021) 
    • not completed until April 2024. 
  • Fiscal Year 2022  (July 1, 2021 thru June 30th, 2022) 
    • not completed until February 2025.
  • Fiscal Year 2023  (July 1, 2022 thru June 30th, 2023) 
    • recently completed in December 2025. 


Our City has been on the Oregon Secretary of State's delinquent filers list since at least January 2022.  The City remains on this list today due to outstanding audits for FY24 and FY25.  For context, Shady Cove is one of 40 small cities (out of a total of 241)  who are on the delinquent list. 


Oregon Secretary of State's Delinquent Filers List:   Delinquent Filers 2025-12   


Some people will tell you it's "not a big deal" to be on the State of Oregon's delinquent filers list.  SCM respectfully disagrees -- looking at the financial and administrative costs to the City, we believe the City Council needs to take credible steps to understand how the City got here, and future issues can be prevented.   The State of Oregon apparently agrees with us, per this recently released article. 


SOS direct link: Oregon Municipalities: Summary of Financial Reporting

What does it Mean When an Audit is Considered "Disclaimed"?

What does it Mean When an Audit is Considered "Disclaimed"?

What does it Mean When an Audit is Considered "Disclaimed"?

Two of Shady Cove's three recent audits were considered Disclaimed. A disclaimed opinion means the Auditors could not do their job.  They couldn't get enough reliable information or documentation to determine whether the City's financial statements are accurate. 


Think of it like this: 


  • The auditors showed up to inspect the City's financial records. 
  • The records were missing, incomplete, disorganized, or otherwise unusable. 
  • Because of that, the auditors couldn't say whether the City's finances are right or wrong. 
  • So, instead of giving a "clean", "qualified" or "Adverse" opinion, the Auditors basically said ...

"We can't give any opinion at all." 


Why is this a big deal? A disclaimed audit is one of the worst types of audit results because it suggests: 

  • The City's financial management may be in trouble.
  • There are major gaps in internal controls or recordkeeping. 
  • The City may have trouble getting grants, loans, or bonds because lenders rely on clean audits. 


For an analogy to our own household budgets...  Imagine trying to verify someone's household budget, but finding that...

  • Receipts are lost
  • Bank statements are missing
  • Expenses aren't tracked
  • Some numbers don't match 

Overview of audit findings 2021 - 2023

FY2021 (Disclaimed)

FY2023 (Clean, with Findings)

FY2021 (Disclaimed)

Fiscal Year: July 1, 2020 - June 30th, 2021

Audit Timeframe: July 2022 - April 2024

Auditor: Isler CPA

Estimated Cost:  $65,000


$1.6 M transferred back from a business account to the General Fund without public explanation (click to read more)


Records unable to be located; City staff unable to provide documentation or information


Disorganization of digital and physical records related to 2021


Possibility of material and pervasive effects on financial statements


Significant turnover in City staff during Covid-19 ***


----------------------------------------------------

Link to audit documents and findings.


Auditors were asked to look for evidence of Fraud (link to more info). 

FY2022 (Disclaimed)

FY2023 (Clean, with Findings)

FY2021 (Disclaimed)

Fiscal Year: July 1, 2021 - June 30th, 2022

Audit Timeframe: May 2024 - Feb 2025

Auditor: Isler CPA

Estimated Cost:  $65,000


Financial information and records related to 2022 could not be located.

Could not verify that the budget was properly published

Could not verify that budget officials were appointed or elected


Balances could not be supported


Could not confirm that Oregon Gas Tax funds were used for allowable costs


Could not confirm that procurements complied with Oregon Revised Statues


Internal controls were unable to be evaluated for proper design, implementation and operating effectiveness as a result of turnover in City staff and lack of documentation of procedures and processes in place during 2022. 


----------------------------------------------------

Link to audit documents and findings. 


Auditors were asked to look for evidence of Fraud (link to more info). 


Mayor Ball admits that Auditors had to work to "get up to a disclaimed audit" (link to more info)

FY2023 (Clean, with Findings)

FY2023 (Clean, with Findings)

FY2023 (Clean, with Findings)

Fiscal Year:  July 1, 2022 - June 30, 2023

Auditor KDP/Sorren 

Oversight Auditor Summer Sears

Completed December 2025

Estimated Cost:  over $100,000


Material accounting errors due to not having formalized accounting policies and procedures related to financial reporting


Material weakness -- strengthen controls over Bank Reconciliations


Material Weakness -- Maintain a schedule of Property Additions


Significant deficiency -- Improve segregation of accounting duties


Recommendation to perform fraud risk assessment


Recommendation to adopt a storage policy for accounting records


Recommendation to Approve and sign minutes of board meetings


Recommendation to hire additional competent/qualified personnel with relevant knowledge and experience in US GAAP accounting, and working experience with internal control over financial reporting to monitor daily activities


Recommendation to Engage Professional Assistance in Developing Accounting Procedures


Scroll to Read More Findings Below. 

Additional findings from FY2023 audit

Problems Weren't Limited to Mayor Tarvin's Term

On Page 36 of the Audit, under Notes to the Basic Financial Statements, Note 3 discusses findings of non-compliance with Oregon Local Budget Law.  SCM is pointing this out, so that Residents understand that the financial problems were ongoing across several Mayors, including issues during Mayor Jon Ball's term. 


Per Note 3: "During the fiscal year ended June 30th, 2023, the City was in compliance with Local Budget Law, except as follows:


  1. We could not verify that the  Fiscal Year 24 budget hearing and budget committee meetings were properly published.
  2. We could not verify that budget officials were appointed or elected for Fiscal Year 24.
  3. We could not verify that the Fiscal Year 24 budget contained a budget message.
  4. The budget document for Fiscal Year 24 did not contain actual expenditures for the two fiscal years preceding the current year.
  5. The City was unable to provide a final adopted budget for Fiscal Year 24, therefore we were unable to verify that
    • Resources equaled requirements.
    • Transfers out equaled transfers in
    • Changes, if made after public hearing of budget, increased estimated expenditures of any fund more than 10 percent or $5,000, whichever is greater, of published estimates. 

  1. We could not verify that transfers made between appropriations within funds for Fiscal Year 23 were made by resolution, as the City was not able to provide all resolutions and many resolutions provided were not signed. 
  2. We noted one instance during our testing where revenue from taxes on motor vehicle use and fuel [ODOT gas tax] were not used for an allowable cost. 
  3. The City did not file the required audit report with the Secretary of State in a timely manner as required by OAR 162-010-0330 and was not granted approval for an extension of time to file. 


Link to  FY2023 Audit Document and Findings. 

City Administrator Parry and Staff were Forced to Re-Reconcile Bank to Ledger

As reported elsewhere on this website, City Leaders were aware that the City had stopped reconciling bank statements to the accounting ledger for several years from 2021 to 2024.  In the FY2023 letter from the Auditors "Communication with Governance", the Auditors mentioned the following: 


Audit Adjustments and Uncorrected Misstatements

There were a significant number of material audit adjustments made to the original trial balance presented to us to begin our audit." 


It is SCM's understand that -- due to the years of failed bank reconciliations, Administrator Parry and staff were forced to manually re-reconcile bank statements to the ledger for all of Fiscal Year 2023.  We understand that this required the correction of hundreds of accounting ledger entries.  It is this work which we understand led to sufficient evidence to allow the audit to be declared clean (with findings) instead of being disclaimed again. 


Paid for by shady cove matters political action committee

INFO@SHADYCOVEMATTERS.COM

Powered by

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.

Accept

Recall Signatures are Verified -- Thanks to our Supporters!!

THE CITIZENS OF SHADY COVE HAVE SPOKEN!!! We were notified on June 10th that Jackson County completed the signature verification.  As we already knew, there were enough signatures to proceed with the recall.  Mayor Richardson will have till June 15th to decide to resign or make the decision to have the City hold an election.    We await the City's response.


It's time for new Leadership.  Learn how you can support the recall effort. 

Learn More